"Artiicial Intelligence" (AI) is a term we've all gotten a bit familliar with. They're useful indeed, but we need to think more about the consequences of uncautious development. It is said that in the year 2045, AI will become superior humans. This is a theory put together by Ray Kurzweil, an inventor, and futurist in the US. He also published a book in the 1990s packed full of predictions of the future. It turned out that 86% of the predictions made became a reality. Even so, you might think that 2045 is too soon. Normally, we predict how much progress we’re going to make based on past results. But this is not the case with AI because of The Law of Accelerating Returns, this where technological innovations in the past intertwine with new ones to speed up the advancements in technology. This means progress is made not linearly, but exponentially . So for example, if you take 10 years from the year 2000, and compare it to the next 10 years, the latter has more evolutio...
All good and interesting questions. I especially like the question about whether AI should have human rights. Your questions are well balanced because almost half of them deal with advantages of AI and others deal with worst case scenarios or other potentially unpleasant consequences of AI.
ReplyDeleteConsidering the limited time that we have, I would give priority to trying to answer the questions that have more of a connection to the kind of NGO you're leaning toward creating. For example, if you want to educate people about the advantages of AI, you can concentrate more on jobs developed by AI and benefits for our day to day life. If you want to inform people about its disadvantages, you'll concentrate more on the dangerous robots, the coming "singularity," and possible invasions of privacy.